Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86059/2019bail granted

Santosh Kumar Hembram v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-18Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86059 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2019 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Hembram, aged about 35 years, Gender-Male, Son of Gopal Hembram Resident of Village - Jorgama, P.S.- Murliganj, District - Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bibhuti Narayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chousa P.S. Case No. 124 of 2019 registered for offences under sections 408, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the present case, an allegation has been made against the petitioner that he has misappropriated the public fund amounting Rs. 4,69,514/- but, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid amount has been deposited by the petitioner in the exchequer of the State which is apparently clear from the letter issued by the Circle Officer dated 21.06.2019 (Annexure-2).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86059 of 2019(2) dt.18-02-2020 2/2 Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial magistrate, Udakishunganj in connection with Chousa P.S. Case No. 124 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T