Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91639 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2025 Thana- Shahpur P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Sonu Kumar S/o Late Ramvilas Singh 2.

Ankit Kumar S/o Vibhuti Singh 3.

Ritik Kumar S/o Vibhuti Singh All are R/o Village- Bhagwatpur, P.S.- Shahpur, Distt.- Nawada. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 09-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The accused/petitioners are named in the FIR and apprehending their arrest in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 317(5), 61(B), and 111 of the BNS and Sections 66-B, 66-C and 66D of the I.T. Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioners is to indulge in cyber fraud along with other co-accused persons, who upon police raid apprehended and upon search, data sheet of customers running into five pages and three mobile phones

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91639 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026 2/3 were alleged to be recovered from their possession.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for petitioners that the name of this petitioner transpired on the basis of disclosure of apprehended co-accused persons, in furtherance of which, no incriminating material appears recovered from their possession as to connect with present crime in question. It is submitted that similarly situated coaccused persons have already been granted bail by one of learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court through Cr. Misc. No.82301 of 2025 dated 02.12.2025 and as a matter of judicial parity, the petitioners also deserve bail. The petitioners claimed clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as prima facie the name of petitioners transpired on the basis of suspicion arising out of disclosure of the apprehended co-accused persons, where admittedly incriminating materials not appears to be recovered from physical possession of these petitioners, accordingly, all above-named three petitioners, who are men of clean

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91639 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026 3/3 antecedent, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, are directed to be released on bail in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Nawada/concerned court, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'CrPC')/under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short 'BNSS').

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) Sanjeet/- U T