← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./790/2026bail granted

Ammi Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.790 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2025 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1 .

Ammi Devi W/O Madan Das Resident of Village- Arer Durga Mandir, P.S.- Patauna, Dist- Madhubani 2.

Sunita Kumari @ Sumita Kumari S/O Madan Das Resident of Village- Arer Durga Mandir, P.S.- Patauna, Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP For OP 2 :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 137(2), 87, 64, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3 . As per F.I.R. co-accused Raushan Kumar abducted informant and made physical relation with her on the false promise of marriage . When informant asked accused persons for marriage , then they refused to do so and demanded Rs. 10 lacs and also assaulted her.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per F.I.R. itself, specific accusation of kidnapping and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.790 of 2026(2) dt.21-01-2026 2/2 committing rape upon the informant is against co-accused Raushan Kumar. So far as these petitioners are concerned, they have been made accused in this case merely because they happen to be mother and married sister of co-accused Raushan Kumar. There is no specific allegation of overt act against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as informant has opposed the bail petition.

6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Madhubani in connection with Madhubani Mahila P.S. Case No. 46 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T