Surya Pratap Singh, v. Patna Municipal Corporation Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1674 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15378 of 2019 ====================================================== Surya Pratap Singh, S/o Late Keshavendra Pratap Singh, R/O- Tarkeshwar Sadan, New Kulharia House, Exhibition Road, P.O.- GPO, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna- 800001.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

Patna Municipal Corporation Patna through the Municipal Commissioner. 2.

The Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation. 3.

The Executive Engineer, Nutan Rajdhani Circle (North), Patna Municipal Corporation.

4.

The Vigilance Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. 5.

The officer-in-Charge, Gandhi Maidan Police Station, Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

6.

The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 7.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

8.

Digvijay Singh, Son of Late Mahendra Pratap Singh, Resident of New Kulhariya House, West Exhibition Road, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Alok Ranjan, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sinha, AC to AAG7 For the PMC :

Mr. Prabhakar Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR) 13-12-2022 Mr. Alok Ranjan, learned Advocate for the appellant, who has challenged the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge on 17.12.2019 in CWJC No. 15378 of 2019, submits that the writ petition has finally been disposed of.

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1674 of 2019(5) dt.13-12-2022 2/2 He further submits that the aforenoted order was passed on 23.01.2020 and the final order passed by the Court in the writ petition has not yet been appealed against. This appeal therefore looses its efficacy as no purpose would be served in challenging the interim order in a writ petition which has now been finally disposed of. The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) ( Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) rishi/- U