Guddu Sah @ Guddu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.513 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2025 Thana- SHEOHAR District- Sheohar ====================================================== Guddu Sah @ Guddu Kumar Son of Ramji Sah Resident of village - Mali Pokharbhinda, P.S.- Sheohar, District - Sheohar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 712 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2025 Thana- SHEOHAR District- Sheohar ====================================================== Ramchandra Sah Son of Late Saryug Sah Resident of village - Mali Pokharbhinda, P.S.- Sheohar, District - Sheohar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 513 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate Ms. Divya Bharti, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 712 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate Ms. Divya Bharti, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ======================================================
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.513 of 2026(4) dt.24-03-2026 2/3 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State in both the aforesaid cases.
2. The petitioner of both the aforesaid cases seeks bail in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 375 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(1), 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 74, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita to which Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita was added.
3. The petitioners and others are said to have assaulted the victim. One Shivan Kumar is the main accused who has assaulted the victim.
4. The petitioners are in custody since 09.10.2025.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case.
6. Learned APP appearing for the State and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners.
7. Considering the fact that there is no direct allegation against the present petitioners, these applications are allowed.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.513 of 2026(4) dt.24-03-2026 3/3
8. Let the petitioner of both the aforesaid cases, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar/ concerned Court below in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 375 of 2025.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T