Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85630/2019allowed

Dhananjay Sah @ Dhanjay Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-31Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85630 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2019 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan ====================================================== DHANANJAY SAH @ DHANJAY SAH S/o Ganga Sagar Sah R/o villageBagora, P.S.- Daraunda, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.P. Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 31-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioner is in custody in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 183 of 2019 for the offence under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against this petitioner is that he was involved in loot of 80,000/- and one motorcycle.

Learned counsel submits that petitioner has been made accused only on the basis of confessional statement and there is no other independent material to connect the petitioner in the commission of crime.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 15.10.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85630 of 2019(3) dt.31-01-2020 2/2 Considering the fact that petitioner has remained in custody for more than three months, the Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, let the petitioner, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st, Siwan, in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 183 of 2019 subject to the condition that petitioner shall extend full cooperation in early conclusion of trial. In the event, the petitioner is found delaying the court proceeding, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U T