Md. Sabbir Alam @ Sabir Alam @ Md. Sabir Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91111 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-498 Year-2025 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Md. Sabbir Alam @ Sabir Alam @ Md. Sabir Alam S/O Md. Sadik Khan @ Saddik Khan R/O Village- Tipau, P.S- Wazirganj, Dist.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP For the Informant :
Md. Murad Ashraf, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant/Opposite Party No. 2.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126, 115(2), 117(1), 118(1), 109, 103(1), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per F.I.R., it is alleged that this petitioner, along with other named accused persons, assaulted on the head of maternal uncle of the informant by means of Gadasa as a result of which, he died during course of treatment.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Allegation
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91111 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant/Opposite Party No. 2 have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail of the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he, along with other accused persons, assaulted uncle of the informant as a result of which, during course of treatment, he died.
6. Considering facts and circumstances of the case, fact that petitioner is one of the assailant of the deceased and gravity of offence, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T