← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/872/2020disposed

Satish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-16The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.872 of 2020 ====================================================== Satish Kumar, Son of Pashupati Prasad, Resident of Village/MohallaSarswati Nagar (Bhagwanpur), P.S. Bhagwanpur, Distt. Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

3.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Muzaffarpur.

4.

The Block Development Officer, Muzaffarpur.

5.

The Chairman, Arwan Development Agency, Muzaffarpur. 6.

The Panchayat Mukhiya Gram Panchayat, Bhagwanpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Kumari Sujata Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kumar Alok (SC- 7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 16-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Petitioner has prayed inter alia for the following relief/s:

"For issuance of writ for order or direction commanding the respondents to make arrangement for flowing of the sewerage and waste water in his mohalla Sarswati Nagar, Reva Road, under Bhagwanpur Gram Panchayat, P.S. Sadar, DistrictMuzaffarpur." After the matter was heard for some time, learned

Patna High Court CWJC No.872 of 2020(2) dt.16-01-2020 2/2 counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the concerned respondents to consider and decide the representation, which the petitioner shall be making afresh within a period of four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the State states that upon receipt of such request, if any, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law, expeditiously and positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.

We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U