Satya Narayan Yadav @ Satay Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91028 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-207 Year-2024 Thana- LAUKAHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Satya Narayan Yadav @ Satay Narayan Yadav, Son of Late Shayam Dev Yadav @ Late Shyamdev Yadav, Resident of village - Madhopur, Ward No.- 10, P.S.- Laukaha, District - Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Nitu Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case No. 207 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that in the background of earlier land dispute, the petitioner and other accused persons stopped the motorcycle of the informant and brutally assaulted him. They also snatched the motorcycle, Rs. 6,500/- and a mobile from the informant.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He is only the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91028 of 2025(2) dt.30-01-2026 2/2 member of mob. The nature of allegation is general and omnibus. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. It has also been submitted that other co-accused person has been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 86291 of 2025. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 23.06.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Laukha P.S. Case No. 207 of 2024.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T