Sharan Yadav @ Ram Sharan Yadav @ Ram Sharan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5874 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2018 Thana- AKBARPUR District- Nawada ====================================================== SHARAN YADAV @ RAM SHARAN YADAV @ RAM SHARAN KUMAR Son of Sahdeo Yadav Resident of Village - Khaira, P.S.- Akbarpur, DistrictNawada. ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989 against refusal of the prayer for bail by order dated 09.12.2019 in Spl. Case No. 171 of 2018 (arising out of Akbarpur P.S. Case No. 238 of 2018) passed by learned A.D.J.-I-cum-Spl. Judge, Nawada in connection with aforesaid case, registered under Sections 147,148,149,307,302 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 3(ii)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Submission is that about seventeen person are named in the F.I.R. and the specific allegation is against Rahul Yadav,
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.5874 of 2019(3) dt.05-02-2020 2/2 Rajendar Yadav and Ranjan Yadav.
Submission is that some other co-accused have already been allowed bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.03.2019/Annexure-3.
Considering the above facts, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.
Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Ranjeet/Gaurav U T