Md. Naushad @ Md. Amanullah @ Amanullah @ Md. Naushad Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91975 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-397 Year-2025 Thana- PAKARIBARAW District- Nawada ====================================================== Md. Naushad @ Md. Amanullah @ Amanullah @ Md. Naushad Alam S/O Jilani @ Dr. Jilani @ Mohammand Ghulam Jilani Resident of village- Pakri Barawan Mustaka Nagar, P.S.- Pakri Barawan, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate :
Mr. Arjun Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha. A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Pakri Barawan P.S. Case No. 397 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 329(3), 324(2), 126(2), 115(2), 110, 352 of BNS, 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that on 30.09.025, all the accused persons as named in the FIR including the petitioners came armed with weapons to the house of informant and started abusing him and destroying the household articles, and when it was objected to, then it is alleged that Md. Naushad assaulted the informant with irod rod on his head as a result of which he was injured. Accordingly,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91975 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/2 this FIR was registered.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent. The entire prosecution story is false, fabricated and concocted. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute and previous enmity.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the fact that there is a direct allegation against the petitioner of assaulting the informant on his head which is a vital part of the body and the injury sustained is grievous in nature. Under these circumstances, the Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Gaurav Sinha/- U