Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1122 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-899 Year-2025 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Vikash Kumar S/O Rambabu Sah @ Rambaboo Sah R/o vill - Chausiya, P.s.- Sonpur, Distt.- Saran 2.
Neeraj Kumar S/o Rambabu Sah @ Rambaboo Sah R/o vill - Chausiya, P.s.- Sonpur, Distt.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 899 of 2025 for the offences registered under Sections 331(4), 305 of the B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, on 05.09.2025 when the informant went to her old house she found that lock of the door was broken and her belongings and cash of Rs. 2 lakhs were stolen by the unknown thieves.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. Petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. From the seizure-list it appears that the articles recovered from the house of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1122 of 2026(3) dt.23-02-2026 2/2 petitioners belong to them. The recovered articles were not put on T.I.P. Except confessional statement, there is no material against the petitioners. Petitioners are young boys aged about 23 and 21 years old respectively. Petitioner No. 1 has two criminal antecedents and Petitioner No. 2 has no criminal antecedent. They are in judicial custody since 13.09.2025. After completion of investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted. There is no chance of absconding of the petitioners or tampering with the evidence.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties, facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. and period of custody undergone by them, let the petitioners, named above, be enlarged on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 899 of 2025.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U T