Kailu Paswan @ Manoj Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91902 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-456 Year-2021 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Kailu Paswan @ Manoj Paswan S/o- Jamuna Paswan Village- Pindra Kala P.S- Hunterganj District- Chatra Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Paras Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-01-2026 Heard Mr. Paras Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 456 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The case of the prosecution in short is that unknown miscreants followed the bike of the informant, due to which he fell down. The miscreants assaulted the informant and took away the bag and key of the bike. The bag contained altogether Rs. 53,000/-.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91902 of 2025(2) dt.29-01-2026 2/3 committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During the course of investigation, the petitioner was remanded from Hunterganj P.S. Case No. 52 of 2022, and thereafter he has given his confessional statement. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has been framed in this case due to his antecedents. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.01.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of 25 cases.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and will remain physically present on each and every date fixed in the learned trial court, till the conclusion of the case, as most of the cases against the petitioner are of Sherghati P.S. The petitioner will mark his attendance weekly at the said P.S. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91902 of 2025(2) dt.29-01-2026 3/3 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 456 of 2021.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T