Prem Chandra Thakur @ Prem Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1041 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2019 Thana- GOBARDHANA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Prem Chandra Thakur @ Prem Thakur Son of Madan Thakur Resident of Village - Kudwa Mathiya, Police Station- Chanpatiya, District - West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar No 7, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-02-2020 Heard counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Gobardhana P.S. Case No. 14 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. FIR is against unknown. Name of this petitioner has come in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Balkisun Uraon. Nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1041 of 2020(2) dt.24-02-2020 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ist, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Gobardhana P.S. Case No. 14 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T