Bikram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5506 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2024 Thana- SONBERSHA RAJ District- Saharsa ====================================================== Bikram Yadav S/O Gango Yadav @ Gengo Yadav R/O Village- Chandi Sthan, Jamhara, Ward No-9, P.S- Sonbarsa Raj, District-Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sonbarsa Raj P.S. Case No. 181 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 308(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that while the informant was parking his motorcycle, the accused persons, including the petitioners, assaulted him with intent to kill. The accused persons also assaulted him on the head with a Farsa and fired shots. On an alarm being raised, they fled from the spot and threatened the informant with dire consequences if one lakh rupees was not paid.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5506 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. He further submitted that specific allegation of farsa blow on the head of informant is against co-accused Santlal Yadav. He further submitted that co-accused Gango Yadav instigated others to kill the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that other co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.10.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 70961 of 2025. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5506 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026 3/3 Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sonbarsa Raj P.S. Case No. 181 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T