Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91390 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- West Champaran ====================================================== Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Yadav S/o Dhanesh Kumar Yadav Resident of Village- Jaukatia, Chaubey Tola, Ward No. 13, P.S.- Majhaulia, Dist.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akhileshwar Kumar Shrivastva, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bettiah Cyber P.S. Case No.34 of 2025, registered for the offence under Section 318(4), 319(2), 303(2), 61(2), 317(4), 317(5), 111 of the BNS and under Section 66(C) and 66(D) of the I.T. Act, 2000.

3. As per prosecution case, on a secret information a raid was conducted by informant, in which cash, mobile phones, ATM cards and incriminating digital evidence were recovered and technical scrutiny revealed linkage with multiple NCRP cyber fraud complaints, use of UPI/net banking and crypto transaction and transfer of black money was deducted. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91390 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/3 further alleged that co-accused persons who were apprehended on the spot has disclosed the name of this petitioner and also his involvement in the commission of aforesaid occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the name of the petitioner has come the basis of confessional statement of other accused person and no incriminating material was recovered from the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner.

5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the fact that the name of the petitioner has cropped up on the basis of confessional statement of other accused person, which has no evidentiary value and also given the fact that no incriminating material was recovered from the petitioner and further given the fact that the petitioner has disclosed that there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91390 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 3/3

7. Accordingly, the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Cyber P.S. Case No.34 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Prakash Narayan U T