Patna High CourtCR. MISC./90942/2025partly allowed disposal

Rajo Chaudhary @ Rajiv Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-28Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90942 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-254 Year-2025 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Rajo Chaudhary @ Rajiv Kumar Chaudhary Son of Late Rambalak Chaudhary Resident of Village - Pandey Bigha Akri, P.S.- Narhat, District - Nawada 2.

Upendra Chaudhary @ Upendra Kumar Chaudhary Son of Late Rambalak Chaudhary Resident of Village - Pandey Bigha Akri, P.S.- Narhat, District - Nawada 3.

Saroj Kumari @ Saroj Devi Wife of Rajo Chaudhary @ Rajiv Kumar Chaudhary Resident of Village - Pandey Bigha Akri, P.S.- Narhat, District - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 254 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110, 329(3), 117(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are alleged to have assaulted the victim causing grievous injury.

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90942 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2 petitioners have clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 assaulted the victim due to which the victim sustained grievous injury, I am not inclined to grant bail to petitioner nos. 1 and 2.

7. So far as petitioner no. 3 is concerned, she is a woman and there is general and omnibus allegation against her.

8. Let the petitioner no. 3, above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Nawada/ concerned Court below in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 254 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.

9. Accordingly, this application stands partly allowed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T