Gautam Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2106 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2025 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1 .

Gautam Gupta S/o Satyendra Saw Resident of village- Deogana P.S Navinagar, Dist- Aurangabad 2.

Satyendra Saw S/o Late Hazari Saw Resident of village- Deogana P.S Navinagar, Dist- Aurangabad 3 .

Sujit Saw @ Sujit Kumar S/o Satyendra Saw Resident of village- Deogana P.S Navinagar, Dist- Aurangabad 4.

Raushan Kumar @ Anmol Kumar S/o Rajendra Saw Resident of villageDeogana P.S Navinagar, Dist- Aurangabad 5 .

Mukendra Kumar @ Mukendra Saw @ Mukenda Kumar S/o Mandeep Saw Resident of village- Deogana P.S Navinagar, Dist- Aurangabad 6.

Jamadar Saw @ Jamidar Saw S/o Late Keshav Saw Resident of villageDeogana P.S Navinagar, Dist- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-01-2026 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the pre-arrest bail petition with respect to petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 .

2. Permission is accorded.

3 . This bail petition of with respect to petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 is dismissed as withdrawn .

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Nos. 1 , 4,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2106 of 2026(2) dt.31-01-2026 2/3 5 and 6 and the State . petitioner Nos. 1 , 4, 5 and 6 5 . Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126 ( 2 ), 118 (1) , 118 ( 2 ), 109, 303 ( 2 ) and 3(5) of BNS.

6. As per F.I.R., on 06.01.2025 , all the accused persons including these petitioners armed with various weapons and came and assaulted informant and others due to which they sustained injuries.

7. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that dispute over pathway resulted in maarpeet between the parties in which both sides inflicted injuries on each other. Case and counter case . Injuries caused by these petitioners are simple in nature .

8 . Learned counsel for the State opposes the bail petition of the petitioner.

9. Considering the aforesaid facts, and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner Nos. 1 , 4, 5 and 6 as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM Aurangabad in connection with Nabinagar P.S. case No. 11 of 2025 ,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2106 of 2026(2) dt.31-01-2026 3/3 subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 ( 2 ) of BNSS 2023 .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T