Hriday Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3749 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2025 Thana- LAUKAHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Hriday Narayan Yadav S/O Dhanik Lal Yadav R/O Vill.- Jakhi, P.S.- Laukaha, Dist.- Madhubani.

2.

Dayanand Yadav @ Dayanand Kumar Yadav S/O Hriday Narayan Yadav R/O Vill.- Jakhi, P.S.- Laukaha, Dist.- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Hriday Narayan Harshit, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case no. 130 of 2025 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, over a trivial dispute relating to flow of water during rain, it is stated that both the petitioners herein came armed with iron rod etc and the petitioner no.1 assaulted the informant with an iron rod on the head causing injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. There is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3749 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2 case and counter case between the parties over a trivial dispute which would be evident from reading of the FIR itself. The alleged injury has been found to be simple in nature. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and undertake to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioners in the F.I.R., the injury having been found to be simple in nature and the petitioners not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that both the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case no. 130 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, District-Madhubani.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T