Rajesh Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91772 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Rajesh Pandey Son of Suhawan Pandey Resident of Village- Akodha, P.S.- Dinara, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 14.06.2025 accused persons came and Guddu Pandey fired but missed thereafter Rajesh Pandey (petitioner) assaulted the brother of the informant by Gadasa causing injury on head, further other accused persons started assaulting but the informant and his side saved themselves by entering the house and Santosh also tried to assault by knife.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91772 of 2025(2) dt.18-02-2026 2/2 informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the brother of the informant by Gadasa causing injury on head, but then the blow is not alleged to be repeated and the injury has been opined to be simple in nature, as would manifest from Annexure-P/2 to the anticipatory bail, i.e., the injury report. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact that blow is not alleged to be repeated, petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the injury has been opined to be simple, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 280 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T