Patna High CourtCR. MISC./961/2020rejected

Bimlesh Kumar Singh @ Vimlesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-26Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.961 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2019 Thana- JAMOBAZAR District- Siwan ====================================================== BIMLESH KUMAR SINGH @ VIMLESH KUMAR SINGH Son of Wakil Singh Resident of Village-Hetimpur, Police Station-Jamo Bazar, DistrictSiwan. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 26-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Jamo Bazar P.S. Case No.209 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under sections 272, 273, 308 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

As per allegation in the F.I.R., 3.6 litres of IMFL is said to have been recovered from the kitchen of the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations of recovery of illicit liquor is false and concocted and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.961 of 2020(2) dt.26-02-2020 2/2 The application for bail has been opposed by learned APP for the State. He submits that there is an earlier case also pending against the petitioner under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the antecedent of the petitioner under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail and as such the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within four weeks.

(Partha Sarthy, J.) amit/- U T