Baidyanath Yadav @ Baijnath Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1979 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2025 Thana- KRITYANAND NAGAR DistrictPurnia ====================================================== 1.
Baidyanath Yadav @ Baijnath Yadav Son of Late Chhaturi Yadav Resident of Kajha Baniapatti, Ward No.- 5, P.S.- K. Nagar, District - Purnea 2.
Jagannath Yadav @ Jagarnath Yadav Son of Late Chhaturi Yadav Resident of Kajha Baniapatti, Ward No.- 5, P.S.- K. Nagar, District - Purnea 3.
Rajiv Kumar @ Rajiv Yadav Son of Jagannath Yadav @ Jagarnath Yadav Resident of Kajha Baniapatti, Ward No.- 5, P.S.- K. Nagar, District - Purnea 4.
Sanjay Kumar Yadav @ Sanjay Yadav Son of Baidyanath Yadav @ Baijnath Yadav Resident of Kajha Baniapatti, Ward No.- 5, P.S.- K. Nagar, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Md. Fazle Karim, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-02-2026 Heard Md. Fazle Karim, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on account of monetary dispute, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted son and husband of informant by means of lathi, danda and dabiya.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1979 of 2026(2) dt.02-02-2026 2/3
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. The present case is counter-blast of K. Nagar P.S. Case No. 220 of 2025 which was lodged by the petitioner's side against the informant and others and only with a view to save their skin from the aforesaid case, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case, nature of injuries allegedly caused by these petitioners and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1979 of 2026(2) dt.02-02-2026 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Purnea in connection with K. Nagar P.S. Case No. 222 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T