Sekh Dawood @ Sheikh Daud @ Sk Daud v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91681 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2025 Thana- KUNDWACHAINPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sekh Dawood @ Sheikh Daud @ SK Daud S/O Sekh Serajul @ Shekh Serajul R/O Village- Chandmohan Bada, P.S- Kundwa Chainpur, DistrictEast Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocate Ms. Shambhavi Priya, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kundwa Chainpur P.S. Case No. 220 of 2025 dated 09.08.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii) (B), 22 and 25 of NDPS Act.
3. As per allegation, 2 Kg of ganja has been recovered from the house of co-accused, Yogendra Dubey and as per further case of the police, the petitioner and other co-accused were making sachet of ganja at the house of co-accused, Yogendra Dubey.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91681 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/3 case. He further submits that the main accused has been already enlarged on regular bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the case of the petitioner stands on better footing than that of Yogendra Dubey, because as per allegation, he was only making sachet of ganja at the house of co-accused, Yogendra Dubey.
5. He further submits that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 10.08.2025.
6. It has also been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has one criminal antecedents.
7. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one.
8. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail.
9. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this application is allowed, directing the petitioner, abovenamed, to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court below in connection with Kundwa Chainpur P.S. Case No. 220 of 2025, on the following conditions:
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91681 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 3/3 (i) The petitioner will make himself available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required. (ii) The petitioner will undertake that investigation/trial will not get hampered on account of his absence or non-cooperation. He must be available to the police or the court whenever his presence is required. (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. (iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.
(v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) shoaib/- U T