Anuj Kumar @ Munna Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91737 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2025 Thana- TELHARA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Anuj Kumar @ Munna Prasad, S/O Bhogal Ram, Resident of Village- Neem Chawk, P.S- Chandwa, District- Chatra (Jharkhand). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Pushpa Kumari, Advocate Mr. Tej Narayan Singh, Advocate Mr. Harsh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 01-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Telhara P.S. Case no.37 of 2025, registered under sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, 15 year old minor son of the informant was kidnapped by the accused persons in their Bolero vehicle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. was registered against unknown accused persons. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case in course of investigation. The son of the informant has returned and he has not named the petitioner herein. The petitioner is in custody
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91737 of 2025(4) dt.01-04-2026 2/2 since 17.5.2025 and undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the F.I.R., the material that has transpired in course of investigation, the petitioner having been arrested from the house where the victim was recovered together with a country made pistol and three live cartridges having been recovered from the petitioner's possession, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.
(Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U T