Ayush Kumar @ Ayush Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1605 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2024 Thana- NTPC District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Ayush Kumar @ Ayush Yadav S/o Wakil Yadav R/o Vill- Ogari, P.S - Kahalgaon, District - Bhagalpur, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 31-01-2026 Heard Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with N.T.P.C. P.S. Case No. 34 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the informant was informed by the brother-in-law of his daughter that his daughter is seriously ill. After ten minutes, the petitioner called him and told that his daughter is no more. It is alleged by the informant that the petitioner and other family members have killed his daughter.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1605 of 2026(2) dt.31-01-2026 2/3 committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the brother-in-law of the deceased and she was married to Akash Kumar, who has been granted bail by the learned coordinate bench of this court passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33591 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on better footing. He further submits that there is an allegation that she was assaulted. The allegation of assault against the petitioner is not supported, as no injury was found in the post-mortem examination. There was an external injury found on the body of the deceased in the post-mortem report. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 10.10.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1605 of 2026(2) dt.31-01-2026 3/3 Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with N.T.P.C. P.S. Case No. 34 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T