Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2512/2026bail granted

Gajendra Mandal @ Gajendra Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-27Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2512 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2022 Thana- BHAPTIAHI District- Supaul ====================================================== Gajendra Mandal @ Gajendra Kumar Mandal S/O Sadanad Mandal @ Sudhir Mandal R/O Village - Karjain, P.S- Karjain, District - Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrit Abhijat, Advocate Ms. Shubhra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kunal Tiwary, Advocate Mr. Aniket Singh, Advocate Mr. Mimansha Singh, Advocate For the State Mr. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.T. No.397 of 2024 arising out of Bhaptiahi P.S. Case No. 144 of 2022, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302 and 34 of I.P.C.

3. In the trial, the informant has said that the deceased was assaulted by Sadanand Mandal@ Sudhir Mandal, the father of the petitioner and the petitioner is in jail since 20.03.2024.

4. Learned APP appearing for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2512 of 2026(4) dt.27-04-2026 2/2

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District Sessions Judge-I, Supaul /concerned Court below in connection with Bhaptiahi P.S. Case No. 144 of 2022.

6. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) sanjeev/- U T