Arvind Yadav @ Arbind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6441 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== Arvind Yadav @ Arbind Kumar S/o Late Ashok Yadav R/o Village - Fatehpur, P.S - Manjhi, District - Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-06-2026 Heard Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Choubey Jawahar learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No. 231 of 2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioner abused and assaulted the informant and his brother and mother, causing injuries.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6441 of 2026(5) dt.24-06-2026 2/3 submitted that the doctor has opined that the mother and brother of the informant sustained simple injuries, whereas the informant suffered a hairline fracture in the wrist. Although the said injury is grievous in nature but it is not on a vital part of the body. Petitioner has clean antecedent. On these grounds, the petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and considering the fact that the injuries sustained by the bother and mother of the informant are simple in nature and the injury sustained by the informant though grievous in nature but not on the vital part of the body, I am of the opinion that petitioner, who is having clean antecedent, has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.
7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 4th, Saran at Chapra / Concerned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6441 of 2026(5) dt.24-06-2026 3/3 Court in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No. 231 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.
(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T