← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1795/2020disposed

Rahul Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-27Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1795 of 2020 ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Singh Son of Yogendra Prasad Singh Resident of MohallaBabu Tola, Banka, P.S. and District- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supply, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Khadya Bhawan, Daroga Rai Path, R.Block, Road No.2, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Banka.

4.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Banka.

5.

The District Supply Officer, Banka.

6.

The District Manager, State Food Corporation Banka/Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Banka.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate For the BSFC :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate with Ms. Usha Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the BSFC.

Claiming to have worked as Executive Assistant, under the District Manager, State Food Corporation, Banka (respondent No. 6) in between 01.12.2014 to 12.05.2017, the petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of a direction to pay his dues, which are admitted for the said period. The petitioner has approached the District Manager by way of a representation dated 18.05.2017 (Annexure- 13). If the said representation has not been disposed of till date and if

Patna High Court CWJC No.1795 of 2020(2) dt.27-06-2023 2/2 payments of admissible dues are not paid till date, the same shall be done by respondent No. 6 in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks' from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

This Court makes it very clear that the Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the petitioner's claim. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) Raj kishore/- U