Md. Shohrab @ Md. Shohrav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.922 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-497 Year-2025 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== Md. Shohrab @ Md. Shohrav son of Md. Belal @ Belaluddin Resident of village- Maheshpur ward No 2 Ps -Supaul District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Prasoon Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-01-2026 Heard Mr. Prasoon Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 497 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352 and 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioner assaulted the informant's mother with farsa on the head, due to which she received bleeding head injury.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.922 of 2026(2) dt.29-01-2026 2/3 perusal of the FIR, it is clear that there is an allegation that the petitioner has assaulted with farsa which is a sharp cutting weapon, and the mother of the informant has received a lacerated wound, which is not possible with farsa and the doctor has also opined that the injuries were caused by a hard and blunt substance. He also submits that the allegation and the injury report do not co-relate. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 06.10.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by the learned APP for the State and submits that the injuries on the head are grievous in nature. Admittedly, there is an allegation of only one blow; there is no repetition of blows. He also submits that from perusal of the injury report, it will transpire that the doctor has found two injuries: (i) Lacerated wound 5x1x1 cm on left frontal region (ii) Bruise 3x2 cm in the right frontal region. After a C.T. scan of the head, it was found that there were multiple acute traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage and extensive facial and skull fractures. The doctor has opined that the injuries are grievous in nature.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.922 of 2026(2) dt.29-01-2026 3/3 considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 497 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T