← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3762/2026allowed

Muzahir Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-30Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3762 of 2026 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34930 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2023 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Muzahir Alam S/O Late Idrish R/O Village- Simalbari, P.S. and Dist.- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Patna 2.

Soni Begum @ Soni Praveen @ Maryam Khatoon W/O Muzahir Alam, D/O Maksood Alam R/O Village- Simalbari, P.S. and Dist.- Kishanganj, Presently R/O Village- Pathkoi, P.S.- Kochadhaman, and Dist.- Kishanganj ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-01-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 79 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323/325/498-A/313/506/504/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act.

3. According to allegation, the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with the complainant on 20.12.2019. It has been alleged that the petitioner and his family members demanded Rs. 5 Lakhs as dowry and that she was tortured physically and mentally and ousted from the matrimonial house due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

4. The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail vide order

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3762 of 2026(2) dt.30-01-2026 2/2 dated 18.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34930 of 2025. While allowing the petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail, it was observed that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs. 3,000/- per month as interim maintenance to Opposite Party No. 2 (the complainant).

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to miscommunication, the petitioner could not surrender before the court below within the stipulated period of four weeks.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances, the application is allowed and the time granted by order dated 18.11.2025 for surrender of the petitioner and furnishing bail bond is extended by four weeks from today. The petitioner has to pay the arrear amount at the time of furnishing of the bail bond.

7. The rest of the conditions shall remain the same as mentioned in the order dated 18.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34930 of 2025.

8. The present modification application stands disposed of.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T