Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1090/2020bail granted

Indradeo Rajbanshi v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-20Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1090 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2019 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada ====================================================== INDRADEO RAJBANSHI, Son of Late Bundi Rajbanshi Resident of Village - Nadsena, P.S.- Sitamarhi, District - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is recovery of 45 litres of country made Mahua liquor from back side of the house of the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner was neither apprehended on the spot nor any illicit liquor has been recovered from his possession and the place from where illicit liquor is alleged to have been recovered is open place accessible to anyone. Petitioner is in custody since 05.10.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1090 of 2020(2) dt.20-01-2020 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Narhat (Sitamrhi) P.S. Case No.215/2019, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T