Pramod Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1069 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-391 Year-2019 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== PRAMOD SAHNI Son of Joyti Sahani @ Jotik Sahani Resident of Village - Shakedhanwat, P.S.- Saraiya, Distt - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Pandey (App 84) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 413, 414 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that petitioner was caught red handed alongwith stolen Bolero vehicle while he was fleeing away. It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that he is innocent and has been implicated in this case due to misunderstanding and suspicion. Petitioner is in custody since 09.09.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below, in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 391 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1069 of 2020(2) dt.20-01-2020 2/2 2019 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T