← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2263/2026bail granted

Lal Bahadur Singh @ Lal Bahadur Prasad @ Bahadur Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-21Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2263 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2024 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Lal Bahadur Singh @ Lal Bahadur Prasad @ Bahadur Prasad S/O Late Harinandan Yadav R/O Vill.- Begma, P.S.- Bikram, Dist.- Patna. 2.

Lalbabu Singh @ Lalbabu Prasad S/O Late Harinandan Yadav R/O Vill.- Begma, P.S.- Bikram, Dist.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 132 of 2024, instituted for the offences under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner along with the family members tortured and killed the deceased because deceased was issueless.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner No. 1 is Bhaisur and petitioner No.2 is married Devar of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2263 of 2026(2) dt.21-01-2026 2/2 petitioners. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioners. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioners are separate in mess and business and has got no concern in the family affairs of the deceased and her husband. The marriage of the sister of the informant was solemnized 25 years ago, but there is no complaint regarding torturing or demand of dowry. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 19.09.2025 and have no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 132 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T