Pyarelal Bind @ Neta v. The State Of Bihar Through The Additional Chief Secretary Of Home Affair, Bihar, Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.177 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2024 Thana- CHAINPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Pyarelal Bind @ Neta Son of Bhailal Bind @ Bhailal Prasad R/o village Lakhamanpur, P.S.- Chainpur, District - Kaimur at Bbabua ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary of Home Affair, Bihar, Patna 2.

The Deputy Secretary of Govt. Home Department. 3.

Collector from District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua. 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Kaimur at Bhabua. 5.

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kaimur at Bhabua Bihar 6.

Station Head Officer of Chainpur Police Station, Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to G.P.23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 20-04-2026 Heard Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arvind Kumar, learned AC to GP-23 for the State.

2. This application has been filed for setting aside the order dated 19.09.2025 passed by the Deputy Secretary of the Government of Home Department (Police Branch) by which the detention of the petitioner has been confirmed. The petitioner has also prayed for setting aside the order dated 24.07.2025

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.177 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026 2/2 passed by the District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua.

3. At the outset, this Court has been informed that the detention period being 24.07.2025 to 23.01.2026 has already expired and the petitioner has been released.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the petitioner is being victimised on frivolous grounds even if there is no public order threat.

5. Keeping in view the fact that the detention period has already expired and the petitioner has been released, this Court is of the opinion that so far as the present writ application is concerned, it has become infructuous. It is disposed of accordingly with liberty to the petitioner to raise all such issues which may be available to the petitioner, if any such occasion arises in future.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) ( Soni Shrivastava, J) lekhi/- U