Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15205 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-342 Year-2018 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar S/O- Late Sobhan Yadav Resident of Village - Laskari, P.S.- Rajoun, District - Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vibhakar Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 06-07-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner who is in custody since 14.11.2019 has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case no. 342 of 2018 registered under sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, Subodh Yadav is stated to have given a farsa blow on the head of the informant's grand son namely, Sandeep Kumar while the petitioner is stated to have given a lathi blow on the son of the informant namely, Maheshwari Shah which he stopped by his hand leading to injury on his hand.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15205 of 2020(4) dt.06-07-2020 2/2 that the allegations as levelled in the FIR are false and concocted. In any case the allegation on the petitioner is of having inflicted injury on a non-vital part of the body. It is submitted that Subodh Yadav and four others have been enlarged on anticipatory bail vide order dated 26.4.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 25602 of 2019. The petitioner is in custody since 14.11.2019 and has no criminal antecedent. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact of grant of anticipatory bail to the five other co-accused and the petitioner being in custody since 14.11.2019, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case no. 342 of 2018 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U