Bikas Kumar Singh @ Bikash Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87122 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== BIKAS KUMAR SINGH @ BIKASH KUMAR SINGH Son of Sri Mahendra Singh Resident of Village - Panpura, P.O. and P.S.- Sandesh, Distt - Bhojpur at Ara, At present Resident of Mohalla - New Mainpura Near Baba Engineering Saguna More, Dandapur, P.S.- Danapur, Distt - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-01-2020 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 141 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 498A, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

As per prosecution case, there is allegation against the petitioner, who happens to be husband of the informant, that he demanded Rs.5 lac and for that he assaulted her and also tried to kill her by sprinkling kerosene oil.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that whole allegation is false and concocted and as a matter of fact reconciliation proceeding took place and after coming out from the court room father and other relatives of the informant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87122 of 2019(2) dt.23-01-2020 2/2 assaulted the petitioner, for that a complaint case has been lodged.

Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the informant, who has submitted that impugned order itself shows that petitioner made allegation of extra marital relationship of the informant and for that he was not ready for any mutual reconciliation with the informant, as such allegation of assault by family members of informant appears to be concocted. In view of above facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. He has to surrender and pray for regular bail. This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T