Dilip Chaudhari @ Dilip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.656 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2019 Thana- SANJHOLI District- Rohtas ====================================================== DILIP CHAUDHARI @ DILIP KUMAR Son of Bharat Chaudhari Resident of Village - Bairi, P.S.- Sanjhauli, District - Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammad Sufyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the FIR named accused including the petitioner is to have assaulted the mother and other family members of the informant by lathi causing injury. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Similarly, situated co-accused person has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.01.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No.933 of 2020. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 26.10.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.656 of 2020(2) dt.20-01-2020 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Sanjhauli P.S. Case No. 135/19, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T