Firoz Saffi @ Firoj Safi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.612 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2025 Thana- SURSAND District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Firoz Saffi @ Firoj Safi S/o Jabbar Safi R/o Village - Chandpatti Ward no. - 12, P.S.- Sursand, District - Sitamarhi 2.

Rehana Khatoon W/o Firoj Safi @ Firoz Saffi R/o Village - Chandpatti Ward no. - 12, P.S.- Sursand, District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioners seek regular bail in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 103, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S.

3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date of occurrence, the named accused persons including petitioners hurled abuses to the informant and on protest, they assaulted the informant. It is further alleged that when husband of informant came to rescue her, the accused persons also assaulted him with bamboo sticks and other weapons due to which he sustained injuries thereafter during treatment he died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.612 of 2026(3) dt.20-02-2026 2/2 case. The alleged occurrence took place on account of petty dispute. There is general and omnibus allegation against seven accused persons including petitioners. Both parties are gotia . After investigation, the charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of absconding of the petitioners or tampering with the evidence. There is no requirement of petitioners for custodial interrogation. Petitioners are in jail since 19.07.2025 having no criminal antecedent and they undertake to cooperate in the trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the facts that no specific allegation is levelled against the petitioners, having clean antecedent and the period of custody undergone by them, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Pupri, Sitamarhi/concerned court in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No.271 of 2025. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Harish/- U T