← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1089/2020withdrawn

M/S Shree Ganesh Medical Agency v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-09The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1089 of 2020 ====================================================== M/s Shree Ganesh Medical Agency a proprietorship firm having its business office at Gayatri Mandir Road, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan through its authorised representative namely Mohit Somani male aged about 25 years Son of Pawan Kumar Somani resident of Ward No. 45, Somani Sadan, Thorat Ki Goth, Lohia Bazaar, Laskar, Gird, Gwalior- 474009 (M.P.) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through The Principal Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Department of Mines and Geology, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate Jamui.

5.

The Mineral Development Officer, Jamui.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha (GA 7) Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Spl. P.P., Mines ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 09-03-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): "A. For a direction upon the respondents to conduct fresh bidding of the sandghats in the district of Jamui which was advertised for settlement through notice inviting tender;

B. For a declaration that the petitioner could not be deprived of participation in the tender process for reasons of technical glitches in the process of uploading of documents required for bidding in terms of the tender notice as it was onus of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.1089 of 2020(3) dt.09-03-2022 2/2 respondent department and it's authorities to facilitate smooth uploading of documents by intending bidders;

C. For further holding that maximum participation of intending bidders would be in the interest of public revenue and the respondent department ought to have considered the complain of the petitioner and made arrangements for inclusion of the petitioner in the tender process;

D. For grant of any other relief or reliefs to which the petitioner is entitled in the facts and circumstances of this case."

Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that, in view of the intervening developments, the petition may be permitted to be withdrawn.

Prayer allowed.

Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/-DKS U