Mithun Paswan @ Mithun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2131 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2025 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== MITHUN PASWAN @ MITHUN KUMAR S/O BRAHMDEO PASWAN R/o vill - Loknathpur Ganj Manohar Tola, P.S.- Dalsingh Sarai, Distt.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dalsing Sarai P.S. Case No. 128/2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of three cases and is in custody since 18.07.2025 and the informant alleges that petitioner fired causing firearm injury to maternal nephew of the informant on head, the second bullet hit Balkishan causing injury on chest and the third bullet hit Sushila who
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2131 of 2026(3) dt.21-04-2026 2/2 became unconscious.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that no doubt the allegation is of firing but no one died.
5. Learned APP opposes the bail application and submits that specific allegation of firing causing injury to three persons has been alleged against the petitioner and petitioner has antecedent of two serious cases from before and if privilege of bail is granted, the petitioner may abscond.
6. Considering the submission made by the learned APP, the Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
7. The regular bail application of the petitioner is rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T