Ashutosh Kumar @ Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86867 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2019 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna ====================================================== ASHUTOSH KUMAR @ SANTOSH KUMAR Son of Sri Jitendra Narayan @ Jitendra Sharma Resident of Village- Chesi, P.S.- Naubatpur, Distt- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pancha Nand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 387, 506/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant in his written complaint has alleged that while he was in his shop on 16.03.2019, he received 'Whatsapp Message' from a particular mobile by which ransom was demanded.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The mobile number disclosed in the written complaint does not belong to the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 05.09.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86867 of 2019(2) dt.20-01-2020 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending, in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 181 of 2019, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U