← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1704/2020disposed

Krishna Kumar Prasad, v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-25Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1704 of 2020 ====================================================== Krishna Kumar Prasad, Son of Late Arjun Prasad, Resident of MohallaMadhubani Nagar Parishad, Ward No. 15, P.S. Khajanchi Hat, District Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Purnea.

3.

The Deputy Collector Establishment, Purnea.

4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dhmdaha, District-Purnea. 5.

The District Provident Fund Officer, Purnea.

6.

The Accountant General of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md.N.H.Khan (Sc1) For the Accountant General :

Mr. Chaitanya Swaroop, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 25-08-2022 In compliance of the earlier order of this Court dated 26.7.2022, the learned District Magistrate, Purnea is present in the Court and has submitted that the entire amount of gratuity, group insurance, GPF and leave encashment has been paid and as far as the pension is concerned, 90% amount has already been paid, however, the balance amount of 10% pension and the benefits of ACP would be paid within a period of four weeks from today, after appropriately dealing with the

Patna High Court CWJC No.1704 of 2020(4) dt.25-08-2022 2/2 intermittent breaks in service of the petitioner herein, on the administrative side.

In such view of the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing further remains for adjudication, however, the petitioner be granted liberty to agitate his subsisting grievances, if any before the respondent authorities.

This Court is satisfied that nothing further remains for consideration, hence, the present writ petition stands disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioner to agitate his subsisting grievances, if any, before the concerned respondent authorities.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U