← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2781/2020withdrawn

Nandlal Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-06The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2781 of 2020 ====================================================== Nandlal Mahto Son of Rajgir Mahto Village- Madhuban Got, P.S.- Bajpatti, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, the Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

3.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sitamarhi. 4.

The Distt. Executive Engineer (Building and Construction Department). 5.

The Block Development Officer, Bajpatti.

6.

The Field Officer (Supervisor), Bajpatti.

7.

Awash Sahayak at Gram Panchayat Raj, Madhuban East, Block Bajpatti. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Devendra Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Anjani Kumar (Aag4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 06-02-2020 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- "That by this public interest application petitioner seeks indulgence to the Hon'ble Court for issuance of writ/writs, order/orders/direction/directions in the nature of mandamus and directing and commanding the respondent authorities for inquire into the matter of the illegalities and irregularities was happened by the authorities concern and have panelised who have illegally sanctioned the money in the scheme of Pradhan Mantri Awash

Patna High Court CWJC No.2781 of 2020(2) dt.06-02-2020 2/2 Yojana, block-Bajpatti situated at Gram Panchayat Raj Madhuban east and the authorities concerned misused the Govt.

money. Whereby and whereunder the authorities have illegally sanctioned on the same privilege candidates in twice and thrice and have deprived the advantage of actual privilege person. Any other relief and reliefs as your Lordships may deem fit and proper."

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition.

Permission is allowed.

The present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Tiwary/-Ajay/- U