Bigan Chaudhary @ Bigan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6795 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-566 Year-2024 Thana- PANCHRUKHI District- Siwan ====================================================== Bigan Chaudhary @ Bigan Yadav S/o Late Baburam Chaudhary R/O VillageSarauti, Police Station- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Devendra Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mrs. Kumari Anupam, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 13-02-2026 Heard Mr. Devendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mrs. Kumari Anupam, learned counsel for the Informant and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Panchrukhi P.S. Case No. 566 of 2024 for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 302(2),

352. 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. lodged on 01.12.2024 by the informant, Munna Yadav,

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that he was ploughing the field when the agnates including the petitioner reached, allegation against this petitioner is of giving 'dab' blow on the head of the informant causing injury. Later, they escaped. This led to the FIR.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6795 of 2026(3) dt.13-02-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already suffered by being in custody since 12.02.2025 and undertakes not to indulge in any criminal activity and shall be diligently appearing in trial without fail.

5. Learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel representing the informant jointly submit that allegation against this petitioner is of hitting of the head.

6. Though the allegation is there, he has remained in custody since 12.02.2025, has no criminal antecedent, an undertaking has been given as recorded above, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of bail with conditions.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Siwan, in connection with Panchrukhi P.S. Case No. 566 of 2024 subject to the following conditions:

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document (Aadhar Card/Driving License/Voter ID/Pan Card etc.) to show his bona fide;

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6795 of 2026(3) dt.13-02-2026 3/3 (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for next six months to mark his attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds; (iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T