← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15078/2020rejected

Md. Yusuf v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-04Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15078 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2017 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

MD. YUSUF Son of Late Md. Mahmud Resident of Village - Baratand, P.S.- Rajauli, District - Nawada.

2.

Md. Ashique @ Md. Asif Son of Md. Yusuf Resident of Village - Baratand, P.S.- Rajauli, District - Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Kanchan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 04-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 288 of 2017 registered under Sections 3/4/5 of the Explosive Substance Act.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that earlier prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail was rejected by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 79130 of 2018 on 05.02.2019.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioners by contending that on merit prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15078 of 2020(6) dt.04-01-2022 2/2 bail was rejected on 05.02.2019 by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 79130 of 2018. There is no changed circumstance in the present case. Hence, the petitioners do not deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions advanced on behalf of the State, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners is again rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) shailendra/- U T