Sahendra Paswan @ Sahendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.392 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2025 Thana- TERHAGACHH District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Sahendra Paswan @ Sahendra Kumar Son of Late Ramchandra Paswan Resident of Village- Shishagachhi, P.S.- Terhagachh, District- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Upendra Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 28.08.2025 at about 8:30 PM, when informant was going to his house on a motorcycle, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, attacked on him by sword as a result of which he sustained multiple injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. From bare perusal of the F.I.R. it is apparent that there is no allegation of any specific overt act against petitioner. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. As a matter of fact, petitioner has falsely
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.392 of 2026(6) dt.23-06-2026 2/2 been implicated in this case because he happens to be brother of Devendra Paswan who was dashed and assaulted by informant and his relatives for which Devendra Paswan lodged Tedhagachh P. S. Case No. 169 of 2025 and in revenge, this false and concocted case has been lodged against petitioner and others. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the backdrop of the case, nature of accusation, case and counter case and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Tedhagachh P. S. Case No. 168 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T