Sadhna Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 651 of 2018 Sadhna Patel W/o W/o Shri Aditya Nath Patel Aged About 42 Years Presently Working As Teacher Shishu Kendra, Keradand, BlockPratapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department, Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director, Department Of Women And Child Development, Indravati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Women And Child Development Officer, Surajpur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For petitioner :

Mr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate For State :

Mr. Majid Ali, Dy. GA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 18/01/2018 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working as Teacher in Shishu Shiksha Kendra, Keradand, Block Pratappur, District Surguja. Further, from March 2016 onwards, she is not being paid honorarium of Rs.400/ per month.

2.

Considering the limited nature of relief claimed in the petition, it Is deemed appropriate that on petitioner's submitting representation within a period of 15 days from today, the respondent No.3 shall consider and decide the petitioner's representation regarding claim for honorarium within a period of two months from the date of submission of representation. 3.

The writ petition stands disposed of.

4.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order as opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit