Visheshar Singh Patel And ORS. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.6669 of 2009

1. Visheshar Singh Patel, aged about 51 years, S/o Shri Udai Ram, M.A., D.Ed., Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Girls Higher Secondary School, Pandatarai, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

2. Tankeshwar Prasad, aged about 48 years, S/o Shri Heera Prasad, M.A., B.T.I., Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Charbhathakhurd, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

3. Lalji Chandravanshi, aged about 48 years, S/o Shri Jeetram Chandravanshi, B.A. (Second Class), B.T.I. Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Charbhathakhurd, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

4. Rajendra Prasad Tiwari, aged about 47 years, S/o Shri Bharat Lal, M.A., B.T.I., Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Mahamaya Pandariya, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

5. Galiram Prajapati, aged about 51 years, S/o Shri Bodh Ram, B.Com, D.Ed., Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Godwabudam, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

6. Rajendra Kumar Sharma, aged about 45 years, S/o Shri Baldeo Prasad, M.A., D.Ed., Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Rehuntakhurd, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

7. Anjor Singh Paikara, aged about 43 years, S/o Shri Ramjan Singh, M.A., D.Ed., Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School, Pandatarai, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

8. Krishna Kumar Gupta, aged about 43 years, S/o Shri Rameshwar Prasad Gupta, M.A., B.Ed., Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Saraipatera, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

9. Sahdeo Ram Sahu, aged about 48 years, S/o Shri Tekram Sahu, M.A., B.T.I., Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Charkhurakala, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Secretariat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)

2. The Collector, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

3. District Education Officer, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioners Mr. V. G. Tamaskar, Advocate For Respondent-State Mr. R. K. Bhagat, Dy. GA Hon'ble Justice Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 03/08/2021 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that during the pendency of the writ petition, all the petitioners except petitioner Nos.2, 8 & 9 have been promoted on the post of Head Master. The petitioner Nos.2, 8 & 9 have already made representation to the respondent authorities in this regard, but the same has not been considered and decided till date, therefore, the respondent authorities may be directed to consider the representation of the petitioner Nos.2, 8 & 9.

2.

Learned State counsel would submit that the petitioners' representation shall be decided expeditiously.

3.

Be that as it may, the respondent authorities, particularly the respondent No.2, are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner Nos.2, 8 & 9 in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

5.

The petitioners are at liberty to file additional representation before the respondent authorities.

Sd/- Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge Nirala