Nemichand Bhaskar v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 35 of 2021 Nemichand Bhaskar S/o Chaindas Bhaskar Aged About 35 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Government Primary School Piparpara Block Mungeli District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary , Department Of Panchayat , Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh.
3. Block Education Officer Mungeli District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State :
Mr. Amit Buxy, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 19.01.2021
1. The limited grievance which the petitioner has raised in the present writ petition by virtue of the order passed by this Court in the case of Mukesh Kumar Patel Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, WPS No. 2530/2017 decided on 26.11.2017 have been granted benefit of revised pay scale on completion of 8 years of service.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance which now remains is that the benefit is being provided to the petitioner prospectively and though the respondents have made a calculation
which the petitioner is entitled from the date of his completion of 8 years of service but no effective orders have been passed nor the department has taken any steps for release of the arrears of payment. The petitioner prays for appropriate direction to the respondents for releasing the said amount.
3. Without entering into the merits of the case and taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Mukesh Patel (Supra) which has also been affirmed by the Division Bench and taking note of the fact that respondents have complied with the order to the extent of granting revised pay scale to the petitioner, let respondents No. 2 & 3 take an appropriate decision at the earliest so far as release of the arrears of payment which the petitioner is entitled for. Expecting a decision from the respondents within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Jyotijha