High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2290/2009non prosecution

Smt. Santwana Lal v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ANR.

2018-08-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

(^ i &^/<7 Injthe Hon'ble Hieh Court of Chhattishsarh at Bilaspur (C.G.} W.P.(S) No.

§0^0 200^ Smt. Sanfwana Lal aged 44 years WifeofSudhirial Resident ofQuarter No.E Block No.13, Street-9, Sector - 5, Bhilamagar, QsiH-r^-w^' Petitioner

Versus

Respondents ...

1. State of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, \':3V^^^1 Panchayatand GraminVikash Vibhag ...-^..^'^ Ministry, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ ".•,;^r6v?i^ ..-•••"

.-^y}""'

^'^

2. ChiefExecutive Officer, Janpada Panchayat, Diirg (C.G.) 9< A.

fftt'

Writ petitipn under Article 226 ofthe Constitufion of India for issuance ofWrit Of mandamus/direction or any other appropriate writ.

^ ri-i Ae

^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPS No. 2290 of 2009 Smt. Santwana Lal Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Anr. 07.08.2018 None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called on two occassions.

In the absence of any represenfation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosectuion.

Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Sumit